John Doe

Designer Joined over 5 years ago

  • 0 stories
  • 16 comments
  • 29 upvotes
  • Posted to AMA: I'm Julie Zhuo, director of product design @ Facebook, Oct 29, 2014

    Hey Julie, huge fan of your articles on Medium!

    When it comes to making internal design decisions and gathering feedback, how do you strike the balance between using raw data compared to a designer's intuition?

    1 point
  • Posted to Ask DN: Can we stop putting percentages next to our skills?, in reply to Jon Gold , Jul 15, 2014

    Thanks Jon for your constructive feedback. Always appreciated :)

    Point 1: Binary Ratings - Google has 5 interviews per candidate. Each interviewer gives the candidate a binary number 0 or 1. The scores across the 5 interviews are averaged out. 0-5/5 <- That's a fraction which can be converted into percentages, a float or an integer. I agree that every recommendation on LinkedIn is positive as that's what they're used for.

    Point 2: - A recruiter can determine what languages you speak, your cultural experience and whether you're eligible for a H1 Visa whilst having a bachelor's degree just by looking at the map.

    I agree that there's no internationally recognized scale, that's why we have exams and interviews. If you graduate from university, you are give a number e.g. 4.0 grade point average. When you take an exam, you are given a number. I agree these numbers are vague that's why it's difficult to display it accurately. Even Google now understand that your GPA is not a good reflection of your ability.

    63%, 0.63, 63/100 63px/100px is the exact same thing. I guess it's about how that number is displayed.

    1 point
  • Posted to Ask DN: Can we stop putting percentages next to our skills?, Jul 15, 2014

    Let me try and break it down.

    63% is the equivalent of saying 63/100, 0.63 and displaying a 63px bar in a 100px tall histogram. Percentages have the same weighting in terms of usefulness as a histogram, but they are displayed visually. As you probably already know, recruiters don't spend much time reading pages of paragraphs of text on a resume. Charts (derived from tabular data) are much more easier, compact and faster to digest than rows and columns of text.

    Unless you want to get philosophical, displaying skills quickly and accurately on a 1 page resume is extremely difficult. In fact, displaying anything accurately on a resume is a challenge. That's why companies have interviews so that they can make sure candidates prove what they state on their resume is accurate via the company's own standards.

    On a typical resume, most people would state that they are skilled/experienced/proficient/knowledgeable/trained/ in a app or skill such as CSS. But what does that even mean? Experienced relative to what? Are they stating that they are experienced with writing the syntax or that they are experienced with solving real problems using CSS? CSS is useless by itself. How skilled are they relative to HTML or JS? Knowing the syntax and solving problems are 2 different things. That's why it's recommended to practice coding rather than read it when learning as you gain experience through trial and error and dedication.

    There are so many ways to interpret the same thing. 63% is no more vague than writing the word 'experienced'. Plus I was trying to do something different :) I created a social infographic that displayed the average number of a skill based on the user's ranking and their colleagues ranking as explained below:

    • Dustin's CSS rank: 7/10
    • Colleague 1 rank on Dustin's CSS: 6/10
    • Colleague 2 rank on Dustin's CSS: 8/10
    • Average total rank: 7/10 | 0.7 | 70/100 | 70px/100px

    If there is a better solution for displaying your skills accurately in the smallest amount of space and in the shortest amount of time...please do let me know. Also, 63% is a ranking number. Google PageRank and Facebook EdgeRank do the exact same thing when showing relevant content.

    Related Links:

    Infographics:

    2 points
  • Posted to ASK DN: What Macbook Stand are you using, Jun 23, 2014

    I use the GhostStand by Twelve North. Sturdy but can not be reassembled.

    http://store.apple.com/uk/product/HD138ZM/A/twelve-south-ghoststand-desktop-platform-for-macbook

    0 points
  • Posted to Online community to get practical design feedback?, in reply to Qiuzao Zhang , Jun 20, 2014

    You're welcome, anytime!

    1 point
  • Posted to Online community to get practical design feedback?, Jun 19, 2014

    You can receive useful feedback from the Dribbble community if you ask explicitly.

    Alternatively there's Forrst (http://forrst.com/) and Hunie (http://hunie.co/).

    1 point
  • Posted to What mouse do you use?, in reply to Adham Dannaway , Jun 12, 2014

    @Adham - The scrolling is awesome! It has 2 settings, regular scroll (clicks) and hyper-fast scrolling (smooth). You can alternate between the two by pressing the o/o button just behind the wheel.

    1 point
  • Posted to What mouse do you use?, Jun 12, 2014

    The Logitech Performance MX mouse has pixel precision and I find it to be extremely ergonomic. It just gels in your hand.

    alt text

    8 points
  • Posted to Ask DN : Show your workspace, in reply to Braden Hamm , Jun 05, 2014

    It's a Walnut computer desk made by Piranha. Smooth as silk, check it out here: http://amzn.to/1hgkbWc

    0 points
Load more comments