Kieran Rheaume

Kieran Rheaume

Victoria, BC Pretend designer and product person Joined about 1 year ago

  • 40 stories
  • 128 comments
  • 213 upvotes
  • Posted to Why do chatbots fail?, in reply to Pedro Pinto , Mar 17, 2017

    yo Pedro, it's a cannabis bot! In Canada we're a few months away from legalization, so I'm preparing for an influx of recreational users. The usability of dispensary sites are god awful, so there's a big opportunity.

    My DM's are open if you wanna talk shop :-)

    1 point
  • Posted to Why do chatbots fail?, Mar 16, 2017

    Timely article! Thanks for sharing. I must admit I'm pretty swept up in the chatbot craze right now. It's exciting, and I'd love to add some context to the discussion.

    TL;DR: We have two things happening: Messaging apps becoming hegemonic platforms, and the actual chat paradigm that the user interacts with inside the platform. The former is already happening, and represents a massive opportunity. The latter needs to evolve enough to make chatbots smarter and more useful.

    Let me explain:

    Messaging apps as platforms The popular messaging apps (FB Messenger, iMessage, WhatsApp, especially WeChat) are becoming aggregators of all the other apps and services we rely on. We're still silo'd in the West, but Asian markets give us a glimpse into the future where 99% of transactions - both social and commerce - are handled through WeChat. So big picture, people are going to start doing a lot more stuff inside messaging platforms. This is a huge opportunity for the chat paradigm gain wider acceptance. For background reading on this, I'd direct your attention to Why Messengers.

    Chat paradigm As plenty of people point out here and elsewhere, the 'chat' paradigm has been happening for decades, powered through simple decision-tree logic. What is new is the mainstream acceptance and commercial potential of bots. Not everyone can use a command line interface, but everyone knows how to use FB messenger.

    If we evaluate the success or failure of a bot on the criteria of using perfectly crafted responses to natural language, obviously we're far from 'successful' bots. Right now we should evaluate bots on the criteria of removing friction and adding convenience/friendliness to commerce transactions. A great example is The Edit, which texts you a new vinyl suggestion each day. This combination (chat interface with a basic reccomendation engine) shot them to $1mm revenue in <8 months. I don't know about you, but I'd call that bot a fuckin success. For background reading on scripting smarter bots, I'd turn your attention to Random Access Navigation.

    Finally, shameless plug: I'm working on an ecommerce chatbot right now. If anyone is itching for a new side project, I'd be stoked to chat about it with you.

    6 points
  • Posted to Ask DN: Headshot on my resume? , in reply to Mark O'Neill , Mar 07, 2017

    haha that reference is way too obscure for me

    0 points
  • Posted to Ask DN: Headshot on my resume? , in reply to Arix King , Mar 06, 2017

    Case in point! Makes sense

    1 point
  • Posted to Ask DN: Headshot on my resume? , in reply to Nick Mason , Mar 06, 2017

    Noted. Thanks!

    0 points
  • Posted to Site Design: Lightscale Labs , Feb 21, 2017

    This site is stunning in its own right, but I consider it an extra breath of fresh air considering it's in the cannabis industry which is totally plagued by 90's design sense. Case in point - compare Lightscale to my local testing lab's site D=

    0 points
  • Posted to Show DN: Userflow Pro - See how common design problems are solved in the most popular products, in reply to Ramy Khuffash , Jan 24, 2017

    super dope.

    very confused how the competitive tool works though. Like say, for example, we want to 'monitor' Evernote. What now?

    0 points
  • Posted to What are your favourite examples of digital storytelling?, Jan 22, 2017

    This data narrative about drones is pretty cool: http://www.madebyfriends.co/drones/

    0 points
  • Posted to Bakken & Bæck – The Handbook, Jan 17, 2017

    Very cool Marek. These transparent company documents act as a recruiting tool as much as anything I'm sure :-)

    Couple more notable examples are Crew and Thoughtbot

    0 points
  • Posted to Site Redesign: Wealthsimple , in reply to Andy Lee , Jan 11, 2017

    A small, petty part of me says ha - now you know how Canadians feel ALL the time signing up or ordering anything =P

    0 points
Load more comments