Be nice. Or else.
Chicago Associate UX Director Joined over 2 years ago
RE: "feel less in control" How do you think demo 4 would feel as navigation across the top of the page? would people constantly be bumping it and exposing it? If it were triggered by proximity to a logo, I really wonder how frequently people would trigger a menu bar, get annoyed by it, etc. Any thoughts?
I love the demos tympanus puts together; got excited about this related to a project I'm on at the moment.
Same here. I started exploring UX Powertools, loved it, but found it a bit complex, especially to roll out to a team of people with mixed experience in Sketch.
In the end, I've built a library from scratch, containing the most common components we use, along with basic wireframe elements (boxes, shapes, placeholder, etc.). I spent significant time testing each thing I created, making sure things resized appropriately. In creating it, I've organized around atomic design principles, but for my team, I've changed the naming convention to keep things simplified. Everything we use regular is in a folder called "Components," and the next step up from there is Patterns, consisting of groups of components. From there, we will collaborate on building out reusable templates that suit best practices and our POV on things.
I'm definitely glad I took the time to build from scratch. I know it inside and out, which will help team members troubleshoot anything they have problems with.
That's interesting, thanks. With such a continuous delivery model, and if that's indeed what Facebook are doing, I wonder what the consensus is from a UX perspective on usability and learnability of various UI aspects that change SO OFTEN. Much like your comment about the semi-colon / Boost button.
I'm just always asking myself "why can't they just let a good thing be?"
Really nice response. I'm in the process of helping convert our small agency team to Sketch, and I've been building out a pattern library using Libraries for a few months now. These are great tips and mirror some of my thinking.
One thing we're trying to do (using atomic design) is create a variety of organisms and templates that are reusable and built from our core set of atoms and molecules. Do you use a system such as atomic design to organize and control the things people can freely modify (ex: group of product cards as template), vs. the things that should never change (ex: form fields)?
I enjoyed reading this. I'm working on a UX project at the moment in which I've made some big changes to our traditional wireframe process to avoid duplication of various annotations, modules, etc. I could see taking it a step further and trying to organize it around this methodology, and doing so with much success. Just too far along at this point to deviate, but I'm going to keep this idea in mind for the next project. Nice work.
Hello - the Codex app was a way for me to discover the notebooks and pen and I'm enjoying using both of them so far. Can you explain why, for lack of a better word, the auto detect feature is so "glitchy?" Even in good light with the notebook positioned flat, it seems to have trouble aligning to the dimensions of a page. I've been wondering if perhaps a "guide" at the four corners of a page would help, some kind of small right angle line that the app could detect and determine where the edges of a page are. Wondering if you have looked into anything like that in your development process?
Unfocused client meetings with no detailed agenda that end after an hour or two with no topics that pertain to my team and our work and nothing of value we need to offer. They end up being wasted time in which we're constantly listening for queues or our names to engage with others, but they never come and we realize we weren't needed during that time. It ends up being wasted time that could be better used being productive. It's amazing how much even a couple instances of this a week can throw off the entire week.
I looked up the tvOS guidelines yesterday to see what they had to say about onscreen typography, particularly because I can't stand the lightweight fonts used by HBO Go. Funny enough... Apple explicitly describe how fonts need to be large enough and readable, and that thin fonts should be avoided. At even an average distance, the HBO typography (which doesn't follow suggestions from Apple) is challenging to read.
I can understand giving app developers the flexibility to integrate branding and typography into their apps, but it's a shame to see them not find a happy medium between the guidelines and their stylistic approaches, or, to not offer users some ability to customize it to their liking (ex: font weight, background color, etc.). I would love to see those capabilities in a future version.
What a fantastic effort all the way around on this. Discovered it via Reddit yesterday and have only had a little bit of time to play around with it, but the visual design of it is incredibly impressive.
One of the creators, Luke Twyman, has some really cool work on his personal site: http://whitevinyldesign.com
Be nice. Or else.
Designer News is a large, global community of people working or interested in design and technology.