Not having visual examples on the landing page seems a bit counter intuitive if you're promoting a new framework... But that's just me.
Hi Aaron, I agree with you, this is just landing page for documentation right now. We're working on new landing page.
Thanks for commenting!
No problem! I've started to toy with the framework and I quite like it. Nothing to show and tell at this stage, but I do have to say well done to you and the team!
Anyone know how this compares to Foundation for Emails?
Hi Geoff, it's basically the same thing but without few unnecessary features/components. Also Foundation for Emails have Inky and Bojler doesn't have.
Compare documentations for more information.
Thanks for your reply :)
This looks awesome.
I've always had a special disdain for having to stylize transactional emails. This could finally be the push I need to put in the effort to replace my now 5 year old email template I've only slightly modified for each project.
One thing I did notice though, is that in your buttons example the target area for the link is surprisingly small. It's because the style (most importantly, padding) for the link isn't applied to the anchor, but rather to it's table cell. This could cause some usability problems, especially if this issue also occurs when using the
Hi Joshua, firstly I would like to thank you for reviewing Bojler.
Regarding buttons, target area is small because we had to apply padding to table-cell instead of the link. That's because some Outlook e-mail clients do not support paddings on