16 comments

  • Tony GinesTony Gines, over 4 years ago

    I switched over to Atom a few months ago and haven't gone back. The speed at which Atom is being developed is great and the plugins so far have been fantastic. All of the tight github integration has really sold me.

    3 points
    • Account deleted over 4 years ago

      What about performance? I've heard that Sublime is still much faster and less laggy than Atom, given that Atom is created with Electron (which is more a hybrid web view than a native app).

      1 point
      • Tony GinesTony Gines, over 4 years ago

        It was definitely worse a few months ago. It's gotten much better.

        0 points
      • wojtek w.wojtek w., over 4 years ago

        Still too slow to be used on large projects.

        1 point
      • Rasmus ErikssonRasmus Eriksson, over 4 years ago

        I use Atom for many reasons, but sadly the performance isn't one of them. It still can't be compared to SublimeText yet. There's a noticeable delay when you type and opening and closing files and rendering syntax highlighting and so on all takes longer.

        It's by no means slow, but it's not instantaneous like ST.

        1 point
    • Darrell HanleyDarrell Hanley, over 4 years ago

      The stability of Atom is a deal-breaker for me. It constantly crashes on projects with a lot of files.

      2 points
  • AK SelbyAK Selby, over 4 years ago

    Or you could just do yourself a favor and use Atom instead!

    2 points
    • Michael IngleseMichael Inglese, over 4 years ago

      Couldn't be happier with Atom. Virtually all the functionality of Sublime with less headaches. Auto updating packages & even less resource intensive (for me at least). I still need to spend some time with Brackets, but for now Atom is my go-to.

      1 point
      • AK SelbyAK Selby, over 4 years ago

        I only recently heard of Brackets but it looks pretty sweet, too. I'd love to see a marriage of the two, if only sighs wistfully

        0 points
  • Alec LomasAlec Lomas, over 4 years ago

    I'm actually kind of bummed about this. I was hoping that when Will Bond was brought on board, Package Control would be built into ST3.

    0 points
  • J. C.J. C., over 4 years ago

    Does anyone know why the shortcuts on that site displays like this on my Mac: Missing glyph.

    Seems like I'm missing those glyphs, but only in Open Sans? I can copy-paste it here without problems: ⌘

    0 points
    • Joe Blau, over 4 years ago

      It's working on my machine.

      works

      Which web browser are you using? It working on Safari 9.1.1 and Chrome 50.0.2661.102 for me.

      0 points
      • J. C.J. C., over 4 years ago

        Turned out the problem was locally installed Open Sans, as Jonathan pointed out below.

        0 points
    • Jonathan SuhJonathan Suh, over 4 years ago

      I have the same issue. Do you have Open Sans installed locally? When I disable the local font and refresh the page, it works fine. Haven’t figured out how to fix it with the local version enabled, though.

      2 points
      • J. C.J. C., over 4 years ago

        Actually yes, I had it activated in Typekit. Deactivated it and now it works like it should. Strange.

        0 points
        • Kyle BavenderKyle Bavender, over 4 years ago

          I'd guess your local version doesn't have that character — or maybe that character at that weight & style — something I've seen a few times on TypeKit.

          0 points