Prototyping the Tinder app [mildly NSFW] (i.imgur.com)
over 7 years ago from David Barker
over 7 years ago from David Barker
While there's humour here (it was a Halloween costume, apparently), it also reminded me how prototyping doesn't have to be just on a screen. Remove the novelty, scale it down, and put it on a table, and you have a pretty accurate representation of how to use the main feature of the Tinder app, made with paper.
I very rarely post funny stuff on DN, and perhaps it's just me, but it got me thinking (and smiling).
Let’s not turn DN into Reddit, please.
I don't even know what this community is about. The last big discussion I saw was essentially about crowd-shaming some dude on Dribbble.
In my quick research, these are some of the most common type of articles that pop up (on the font page) in no particular order:
These above articles while of course welcomed don't usually tend to spark interesting discussion. These categories usually tends to deviate to what the shiny new thing is.
After that comes the Ask DN which is more a way to get people's opinion about things.
These are some of the types of articles left in no particular order:
Discussion on Apple/Steve Jobs doesn't tend to say anything really new in general.
Controversial opinionated articles have the same problem. They tend to get lots of attention during their prime time—UX vs UI articles might turn out OK on DN today, but skeuomorphism vs Flat won't—but also usually don't get very interesting amounts of discussion. In my experience, the comments tend to mirror the opinions from the previous discussion about it. The conclusion to many of these questions tend to be relative, subjective and contextual anyway.
Submarine articles and cheap marketing attempts tend to be about how their product is a solution to something they're talking about.
If you take all of that away you won't have much left. Actually if you go back pages of Designer News you'll notice how little we tend to comment at all.
Yea, it's like one comment thread every other day or so, and one good one every two weeks. Not complaining, because most things people say on the internet are worthless, but I welcome length discussions on just about anything around here.
That was an astute analysis! I mainly come here to share neat websites I come across, get advice on something, or lurk for something I've never seen before.
that sounds interesting, got a link?
I'm assuming he's referring to this
looks like it, thanks for sharing
How long have you been on the Internet??? Lurk more.
It's funny man. Chillax.
For the love of God, this. Please.
what could be nsfw on that gif. Please, we're not in the vatican.
Maybe it's what appears to be a nude hairy man. And I also happen to work in a corporate environment.
That's right. I wasn't going to add the NSFW tag, but I thought it was better that I did just in case.
Thank you for it. Some people just don't get it but glad you do.
You're welcome — I appreciate the thanks :)
Hahahahahahaha
Designer News
Where the design community meets.
Designer News is a large, global community of people working or interested in design and technology.
Have feedback?
Login to Comment
You'll need to log in before you can leave a comment.
LoginRegister Today
New accounts can leave comments immediately, and gain full permissions after one week.
Register now