Perhaps his content would be worth reading if he framed it as a postmortem instead of a beat-down. Interview the designers involved, then explore WITH them what went wrong, what could've gone better, and frame it squarely within the context of its creation instead of Eli's weird anti-everyone-else bias.
It's very easy to criticise other people's work without fully knowing the context that it was made under. Ignore this kind of thing and move on.