Designer News
Where the design community meets.
5 years ago from Dominik Porada, Designer
Isn't there a case to be made, with all of these stories compiled, that perhaps it’s not “logistical issues”? Maybe the usual Silicon Valley interview process is terrible at identifying good candidates.
"good candidates" is a pretty meaningless term in this context. rejection often has little to do with the person interviewing; it can depend on the role, company, culture, budget, timing, etc.
Or maybe, just maybe, they interviewed poorly, asked for too much money, lacked experience, weren't qualified, or a better applicant won the position.
What are you even getting at? Are Silicon Valley companies supposed to hire every person that applies? Why is deciding not to hire a candidate such a horrible thing? It's business.
Agreed, it could go something like:
"I asked for 250k to work at the local ad agency as a sr dev, but they said no. I now work at Google for 80k as a jr. dev"
or a better applicant won the position <- this one. Now if ANY of these would say "[company x] picked [person y] instead and look at how [company x] failed since then!*" - in that case, the whinge would be completely legit.
Designer News
Where the design community meets.
Designer News is a large, global community of people working or interested in design and technology.
Have feedback?
"Things didn't work out at a different company due to logistical issues, so I'm going to publicly shame them. Also, now I work at TWITTER!"