Within 2018 — A leadership retreat for women in design(gowithin.co)

almost 6 years ago from Max Lind, sometimes Maxwell

  • Sacha GreifSacha Greif, almost 6 years ago

    I'm trying to explain why a hypothetical white-men-only event would not be the same thing. Even with the best intentions in the world, they would de facto be giving an unfair advantage (being able to attend the event) to a group that doesn't need it, thus reinforcing existing imbalances.

    16 points
    • Sean SchraederSean Schraeder, almost 6 years ago

      So handicap the advantaged or bar them from congregating, however you want to put it to balance the scales a bit, let other groups 'catch up'. Can't beat 2017 social justice logic!

      8 points
      • Sacha GreifSacha Greif, almost 6 years ago

        Yep that's exactly it, glad you got it! :)

        8 points
        • Sean SchraederSean Schraeder, almost 6 years ago

          Affirmative Action 2.0! Neither novel or just ;)

          7 points
          • Christian BundyChristian Bundy, almost 6 years ago

            You're missing the point, although I'm unclear on whether it's intentional.

            Let me spell it out for you as clearly as possible: if you're like me, you benefit from all sorts of systemic discrimination whether you like it or not. If you want to get rid of said-discrimination, you need to take action against it. This isn't meant to hurt your feelings, but this really isn't about you. Here are your options:

            • If you believe that people face discrimination, help them liberate themselves (or at least stay out of their way).
            • If you believe that people don't face discrimination, read a book. Literally any book.

            I'm happy to answer any questions you may have.

            4 points
            • Sean SchraederSean Schraeder, almost 6 years ago

              You are missing the point; and those are YOU'RE options. You are responding to one of my options right now; not accept this groupthink drivel. Happy to keep responding, no questions for you, thanks!

              3 points
              • Todd SielingTodd Sieling, almost 6 years ago

                "your" would be the possessive form you're looking for. Accuracy in a debate is important, logically.

                3 points
                • Sean SchraederSean Schraeder, almost 6 years ago

                  And you know a debate is truly over when one party is left resorting to grammar retorts. Grasping at straws, are you (yoda voice).

                  4 points
                  • Todd SielingTodd Sieling, almost 6 years ago

                    I thought it was over with the name calling, but call it where you see it. I'm poking fun at you because despite your huff-and-puff as the only rational actor in the room, you're human and make mistakes. As for grasping at straws, it's 5:30 on a Friday and god help me I'm reading your comments on Designer News rather than slipping into an end of week whiskey with my friends; I'll grasp at what I can take.

                    Maybe take a break from the keyboard. When things cool down try to wonder why so many people took issue with your points (and how you stated them). Even if you wind up not agreeing, at least you'd put the effort into understanding rather than dismissing with a worn-in conclusion that you came here to grieve over.

                    4 points
                    • Sean SchraederSean Schraeder, almost 6 years ago

                      Life evolves past high school popularity contests; didn’t get the memo? And besides, looking at the upvotes I’m pleasantly surprised by the show of support. Not surprised others don’t want to deal with the mindless horde like I have.

                      I will never tire of standing up for logic and virtue. Enjoy your whiskey, I’m headed to my friends studio to unwind too. Let me know if you need any more clarity during your journey of self loathing.

                      2 points
                  • Todd SielingTodd Sieling, almost 6 years ago

                    Good thing you got an edit in on that 'retorts', right? ;)

                    1 point